My Favorite Translation of the Art of War

John Minford's translation of the Art of War, Penguin Books 2002 (ISBN 0-670-03156-9(hc.); ISBN 0 14 04.3919 6 (pbk.)) is my favorite translation. Minford says that the Art of War is "beautiful and chilling." The same can be said of his translation, a portion of which (Chapter 5) is presented below. However, in order to save space, the excerpt is regrettably not presented in Minford's poetic structure. It is still beautiful and chilling nonetheless.

Potential Energy

Master Sun said:

Managing many is the same as managing few; it  is a question of division.

Fighting with many is the same as fighting with few; it is a matter of marshaling men with gongs, identiying them with flags.

With a combination of indirect and direct, an army can hold off the enemy undefeated.

With an understanding of weakness and strength, an army can strike like a millstone cast at an egg.

In warfare, engage directly; secure victory indirectly.

The warrior skilled in indirect warfare in infinite as Heaven and Earth, inexhaustible as river and sea. He ends and begins again like sun and moon, dies and is born again like the Four Seasons.

There are but five notes, and yet their permutations are more than can ever be heard.

Therre are but five colors, and yet their permutations are more than can ever be seen.

There are but five flavors, and yet their permutations are more than can ever be tasted.

In the dynamics of war, there are but two - indirect and direct - and yet their permutations are inexhaustible. They give rise to each other in a never-ending inexhaustible circle.

A rushing torrent carries boulders on its flood; such is the energy of its momentum.

A swooping falcon breaks the back of its prey; such is the precision of its timing.

The Skillful Warrior's energy is devastating; his timing, taut.

His energy is like a drawn crossbow, his timing like the release of a trigger.

In the tumult of battle, the struggle may seem pell-mell, but there is no disorder; in the confusion of the mellee, the battle array may seem topsy-turvy, but defeat is out of the question.

Disorder is founded on order; fear, on courage; weakness, on strength.

Orderly disorder is based on careful division; courageous fear, on potential energy; strong weakness, on troop dispositions.

The warrior skilled at stirring the enemy provides a visible form, and the enemy is sure to come. He proffers the bait, and the enemy is sure to take it. He causes the enemy to make a move and awaits him with full force.

The Skillufl Warrior exploits the potential energy; he does not hold his men responsible. He deploys his men to their best but relies on the potential energy.

Relying on the energy, he sends his men into battle like a man rolling logs or boulders. By their nature, on level ground logs and boulders stay still; on steep ground they move; square, they halt; round, they roll. Skillfully deployed soldiers are like round boulders rolling down a mighty mountainside.

These are all matters of potential energy.

 

 

 

Sun Tzu and The Art of War

Some historians debate whether a man named Sun Tzu ever existed, much less wrote The Art of War (500 B.C.). Some say that the works of several generals over several decades (or longer) were compiled into one volume and attributed to Sun Tzu, who may be an invention. The debate seems to be about as meaningful as the debate as to whether Shakespeare wrote the great plays attributed to him (My favorite line in the Shakespeare debate is one scholar's answer: "If Shakespeare did not write Hamlet, then someone else of the same name did." So, I take Sun Tzu as a single entity (a man) who wrote The Art of War sometime around 500 B.C.

The Art of War is written like a manual for an emperor, prince, or military leader. It is not a systematic dissection of theory and methodology like von Clausewitz's On War (1832) - which is the seminal Western treatise on war. Acceptance of Sun Tzu's conclusions and recommendations is the main point for his advisees - because staying in power or expanding power is the goal.

Here are ten principles that I glean from The Art of War: (1) A Broad Perspective (War and peace are intertwined); (2) Win all without fighting; (3) A rational calculus of war; (4) Deception, Surprise, Intelligence; (5) Shape the battlefield, battle and adversary; (6) Avoid strength, attack weakness; (7) Comparative advantage, concentration of force; (8) Calculation and boldness; (9) Speed and tempo; (10) Leadership (military and political).

The crux of The Art of War is, in my opinion: Indirect/Internal: The battle is won or lost in the opponent's mind. Direct/External: Maneuver warfare.

Sun Tzu extolls the virtues of winning efficiently by effectively exploiting the indirect approach; e.g., your opponent capitulating instead of fighting. If fighting is necessary, then win quickly at lowest cost. Of course, the indirect and direct are complementary; e.g., In the first Gulf War, the indirect approach was not initially successful, as Saddam Hussein didn't capitulate to U.S. demands and threats. So then the U.S. took a direct approach: massive pounding of the Iraqi with artillery and air strikes followed by an indirect "left hook" maneuver by ground forces leading to internal capitulation. The second Gulf War, or occupation of Iraq, is another story, and will be the subject of a subsequent commentary.